Posted on Sunday 29 June 2008
I guess I’m a sucker for any show that wants to be Mythbusters, so when I heard about The Rock & Roll Acid Test on music network Fuse from Nat I quickly set a recording.
Overall, Acid Test does a much better job of matching the format of Mythbusters than the Discovery Channel’s disastrously-bad Mythbusters clone, Smash Labs. When they do research into their “myths” they either go to sources who make sense and who communicate some good information or they start a fact gathering project that shows the cast breaking down what they need to learn, much like the Mythbusters crew do. Overall, there’s a clear focus on answering a question, something the narrative of Smash Labs loses track of quickly.
However, while they match the style of Mythbusters, there are some small problems that tell me The Rock & Roll Acid Test just isn’t for me. While the early fact-finding segment captures the knowledge-seeking spirit of Mythbusters they also skip over the middle part too often. In one story, a throat doctor was visited. While the show took time to discuss why they were visiting him and what they hoped to learn, only a little bit of time was spent with the doctor and the segment quickly jumped ahead to the narrator summarizing the doctor’s conclusions with very little time spent with him discussing how he reached that conclusion.
On the other hand, there’s definitely potential. Another episode I watched tried to ask if musicians can perform better while under the influence of hallucinogenics. In order to simulate an acid trip, they created a “sensory overload chamber” which was interesting to see. Unfortunately, that, too, was truncated and after one experiment the show jumped ahead to a point where they had a complete design. As engaging as the segment was, it would have been better to see more of how they conceived and built the device.
Another problem for me is that some of the questions tackled by the show aren’t interesting to me. In one of the two episodes I saw, the Acid Test team asked if one could permanently damage their vocal chords by straining them and if loud music could hurt one’s hearing. I don’t really consider these “myths” or mysteries, myself, so those segments came off as boring and clunky attempts at a PSA.
There’s also The Acid Test’s attempts to come off as “rock & roll” and edgy. While sometimes it feels natural, sometimes the show just feels like its trying too hard.
These problems might work themselves out if The Rock & Roll Acid Test finds an audience and lasts long enough to improve. If the show were expaned to an hour (Acid Test is a half-hour long) would hopefully include more footage of the team working through problems and allow expert interviews include a little more depth. Also, if the show lasted a few more seasons, they’d hopefully have to seek more interesting “myths” to question as basics like “can loud noise hurt your ears” are tossed in the “used” pile.
However, in the meantime, I’m just not in the right audience for this Mythbusters clone, even if it shows a lot of potential.









Lose a few hours playing The N's "Hook-Up":
The problem with Diana Prince:
OMG! Really? Julia Child faught Nazis!:
What is BBC America thinking?:
Tune-in Saturday: A Tyranasaurus Wrecks: