Posted on Wednesday 31 October 2007
So. The unintentionally hillarious (when they’re not maddening) Parents’ Television Council unleashed their latest report
If you’ve read the full report before, this year’s one will be very familiar since they, apparently, only bother to write about shows that weren’t in previous reports. Otherwise they just take last year’s write-up and add new pictures to look current. That means, once again, the full report (PDF warning) contains these sentences about Survivor that always mystifies me:
During one episode, two female contestants stripped naked during a challenge in exchange for chocolate cookies and peanut butter. Although the nudity was pixilated, it was captured on tape and broadcast into millions of homes.
Now I get that the PTC thinks that pixelated nudity is still bad. I can agree with them on that… but that is one oddly phrased sentence. I mean that moment from the show was bad because it involved the host bribing two women to strip, but that part isn’t brought up. Yet, the PTC seems to ojbect to the scene being recorded (which is a strange objection to make about reality TV) and broadcast (isn’t that what they’re complaining about in every case?)
Survivor, overall, has plenty of pixelated nudity and it looks for ways to get its titillating moments (like this current season which left cast members with nothing to wear but their underwear for weeks) so to see that one incident mentioned year after year just feels strange.
I also found this bit about Heroes oddly worded:
Don’t be fooled by the title of the show, however. These are not your archetypical comic book heroes who fight for truth, justice and the American Way. One “hero,” Niki Saunders…her alter ego randomly takes over her mind and body and is committing unspeakable acts of violence and sexual deviance.
Uhm, wha? Okay, aside from sleeping with Nathan what sexual things has Jessica done? Which ones were “unspeakable acts of… sexual deviance”? And, once again, shouldn’t they be a little concern about serial killer Sylar or the cold-blooded killer who’s a loving father the rest of the time?
Also oddly worded, this warning about sexual themes on House:
Several episodes have contained sexual content. In one episode, for example, a young man falls ill during sex and explicit dialouge about the possibilities of dying as a result of kinky sex followed. In another, a teenage model suffereing from a mysterious condition claims to have seduced her father and manager. Doctors later discover that she is a hermaphrodite with testicular canceer.
So, uhm, are they saying that having an intersexed patient (who says “hermaphordite” anymore?) is the same as one who is injured during kinky sex? Not having seen the episode, maybe it was handled in a salacious way, but the way it’s written it sounds like the PTC finds the patient’s intersexed nature to be as appalling as the incest.
To be fair to the PTC, they seem to have moved away from the days when acknowledging the existence of gay people was worth raising alarms. Their warning about The Amazing Race could have objected to the show’s frequent casting of same-sex couples. Still, the PTC seems to have a bigger problem with sex than violence, as they usually do.
Just to be clear, I have no problem with giving parents descriptions of television shows that might warn them about the kind of content their kids could be exposed to, I just keep shaking my head at how the PTC keeps doing such a bad job of it. Overall, I think kids-in-mind.com does a far better job of trying to inform parents.









Lose a few hours playing The N's "Hook-Up":
Big Brother 10: No need to watch, we have a winner:
Ooh, Bravo's feeling vindictive and I'm loving it...:
Beauty Pop is instantly addicting:
Ugh, just ugh:
The Rock & Roll Acid Test is just not for me:
The Discovery Channel's Smash Labs -- so bad, it could serve as a case study: