Posted on Monday 30 April 2007
Mely’s commentary about last week’s Heroes is a must-read, nicely analyzing how some of the show’s subtler themes come together. There’s some interesting thoughts in the comments, as well. I was especially intrigued by the comment bringing up the parallel between the timeline made by Hiro and the thousand cranes he made for Charlie.
Some other thoughts:
- There was a lot of scoffing at creator Tim Kring’s claim of ignorance of Watchmen, but I can see how someone could conceive this plot without knowing about Watchmen. At this point in our history, there are other inspirations for a story about a powerful person using advance knowledge of a disaster to gain even more power. I can see how the idea became more Watchmen-like once people who know superhero comics (such as Jeph Loeb) became involved, but I don’t think it’s so hard to imagine someone coming up with Linderman’s plot without having read Watchmen.
- I’m wondering if I’m the only one looking forward to tonight’s episode for the prospect of seeing Adrian Pasdar play a hardened, Machiavellian Nathan Perelli… the closest thing we’re likely to get to seeing Jim Profit show up on television again.
- One other random thought…. judging from the show’s panel at San Diego last year, I wouldn’t describe Adrian Pasdar as someone in love with the sound of his own voice. That’s kinda ironic since if anyone should be in love with the sound of his own voice….
Update: Today is Adrian Pasdar’s birthday. Hooray for April 30.









Lose a few hours playing The N's "Hook-Up":
Big Brother 10: No need to watch, we have a winner:
Ooh, Bravo's feeling vindictive and I'm loving it...:
Beauty Pop is instantly addicting:
Ugh, just ugh:
The Rock & Roll Acid Test is just not for me:
The Discovery Channel's Smash Labs -- so bad, it could serve as a case study: