Thursday, 3 Aug 2006
Heidi posted a solid overview of this year’s San Diego Comic-Con yesterday. There’s one bit I want to address right away:
This was the fifth San Diego I’d covered for a daily website, and my efforts seemed increasingly irrelevant. When every entertainment website and cable network sends fleets of reporters to cover the show and a group Flickr site puts up over a thousand of photos in a few days, the efforts of one little human seems pitiful by comparison.
At this point, I think covering comic-cons for new title and exclusive contract announcements is going to become increasingly irrelevant. For smaller websites, covering an event like this is going to be more about personality and being able to bring an insightful perspective — an understanding one can’t get by watching G4 (snicker) or by reading a the headlines at a comics news site. I expect witty and sharp-minded pop pundits like Heidi to break through as the rare voice that doesn’t sound like every other voice discussing the Con, much like how Tim Goodman’s The Bastard Machine was such a blast of fresh air during .
The continued growth of the San Diego Comic-Con seems to be the most-discussed aspect of the event, especially in light of the recent downsizing of E3. Heidi summarizes what the San Diego experience has become:
Since the broaching of Hall H a few years back the immense exhibit hall has become divided into regions, just like an archeological dig. The far end of the room, Halls A and B are basically the old convention, with dealers, back issues boxes the small press area and the DC juggernaut of a booth. Once you get past the old con, you enter the theme park section which, despite the absence of an actual LucasFilms booth, was wilder and crazier than ever before… It was raging off the hook like a combination of Disneyland and E3. Negotiating this area was my main occupation for four and a half days, as just getting from the press room to a panel became a half hour trek. I’m sure everyone’s experience was the same, so I won’t over dwell on it, except to say that the time and exhaustion factor from walking around is probably the main ingredient of the show now.
Theme park strikes me as the most apt way to describe it. In that sense, the Geek Vegas moniker seems fitting since the Con has a similar mix of spectacle, shopping, hype and exhaustion. The feeling of coming back from a San Diego Comic-Con is similar to the feeling I have after a trip to Vegas — a mix of tired and thrilled, a feeling that it’s about time I get back to reality. I know most people have complained about the crowds, but in those situations I’m usually okay (I walk like most people drive, making me more of a jostler than a jostlee) but it’s another point where the Comic-Con ends up feeling like Vegas.
From my limited experience, the transition between panels was where I noticed the increased crowds the most. Last year, I was able to get a good seat to hear the cast of Teen Titans perform a live script reading because I was willing to sit through the last half-hour of a Rob Zombie panel that didn’t interest me. This year, something like that wasn’t even an option for the Heroes panel which drew an SRO crowd, just like the panel before it. The larger crowds made clearing the rooms slower, as well and most of the panels I attended this year either went long or were delayed by the prior one. Attending back-to-back panels was very challenging.
Heidi also ponders the Con’s success:
I’ve often wondered why, of all fan-created events, comic book conventions have consistently mutated into general pop culture events. Some friends say it’s because comics are inherently weak – other say its because comics are a medium, not a genre, like science fiction and horror, whose own fanfest remain small and insular.
I’m about to write something which is the soppiest, dopiest thing I’ve ever written here, and I apologize in advance, but in some ways…maybe comics are imagination. Wait, hear me out! Dancing, singing, storytelling and creating art are all natural human activities, observable in small children of diverse cultures, and captured in primitive forms from Lascaux on. Using drawings to tell stories is simple, efficient and cheap—and natural. Maybe a lot of really, truly creative people are drawn to this medium because it IS special.
Despite the increasing artificiality of the con as a PR machine, I don’t think the creative spark will go away entirely. All the indie folks at the con had strong shows and made money, and enough ideas and deals were hatched that we won’t see the end of comics as a fountain of IP end any time soon.
I think she’s hit the nail on the head, here, except that I think some of San Diego’s success is unique to that particular institution. While geography was definitely in this Con’s favor, the San Diego Comic-Con was the ripest for this kind of explosion because it’s been so welcoming to the wide range of stories the art form can tell. That’s why I don’t think it’d be a waste of money to promote the next Desperate Housewives there — there’s room for people enthusiastic for comics like Blue Monday, Nana or The Waiting Place at San Diego and I can easily see those people transferring their enthusiasm to Ugly Betty. I’ve been to one Wizard World Chicago, two Wondercons and five APEs none of those cons have the same massive feeling of creative energy that San Diego does. San Diego has always felt alive with a love of so many different things, every other comic convention seems to be much narrower in focus, leaving some groups left on the outside. Unlike other fan gatherings (except for manga, which you might say is the same as comics), a love of comics can translate into a love of many different genres.
Heidi also examines the downsizing of E3 to ask if that show’s implosion foretells dark times for the San Diego Comic-Con. Heidi notes that E3 exhibitors began to hold back their announcements for invited members of the press and how San Diego is beginning to take a similar turn while also noting that Comic-Con is not run by a trade group and has a different set of goals.
Could San Diego be facing an E3-style implosion in the future? I can’t see it happening the same way it did for E3, with a handful of key exhibitors pulling their support. Who could have that kind of impact on San Diego? If Hollywood packed up, there’s still be plenty to focus on, much as if any other category disappeared. It would take a union of disparate interests to duplicate the kind of blow that struck E3 down. On the other hand, if continued growth pushes the Con to multiple locations, the Con’s spirit could be thrown off, damaging the feeling that makes it feel so much like a Geek Homecoming.
Comparing San Diego to trade shows like E3, Toy Fare or Show West is challenging, since the Con lacks the singular industry focus that the trade shows do. Also, the bigger players come to San Diego for something very different from the trade shows. The trade shows are mostly about getting press, about courting the mainstream media. Hollywood comes to San Diego hoping to generate buzz, to get potential customers excited enough to evangelize their properties in ways an ad buy can’t accomplish. San Diego is a very unique beast and predicting its course is an incredible challenge.









I have a new favorite lesbian comedian:
Er... uhm...:
Uhm, what?:
Unity:
ZOMG! Called it!: